comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL/MSWin pixmap limitations, Part 2
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL/MSWin pixmap limitations, Part 2 [message #33054] Mon, 25 November 2002 11:30 Go to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Craig Hamilton (someone@microsoft.com) writes:

> So, it looks like the software solution you mention below wouldn't work for
> switching rapidly between animations, right? I want an instantaneous change
> from a 30 frame cineloop (1024x512) to one of 15 other ones the same
> size....

Depending upon how fast we want animations to be,
we can switch between what we call "retained" pixmaps
(I.e., real pixmaps) and "non-retained" pixmaps (those
that have no real window associated with them). Most
of the time, with retained pixmaps, we have to turn
the animation speed down because the animation occurs
too rapidly. We find that for the satellite images
we are working with that animations in non-retained
mode are perfectly adequate for our purposes, so this
has been a good solution for us.

In any case, the system is flexible enough that
we can turn retained and non-retained pixmaps on and
off at will, so we can monitor window resources (after
a fashion) and alert the user if the animation size
they have requested (for example) is too large for
retained pixmaps. They have the option then of reducing
the size of the animation (either window size or number
of frames), or using non-retained pixmaps.

Users who are used to PCs understand there are trade-offs. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: ladfit: unstable for large x?
Next Topic: Re: passing parameters from base to base

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 15:36:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.27976 seconds