comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » anything more accurate than systime() ?

Home » Public Forums » archive » anything more accurate than systime() ?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

anything more accurate than systime() ? [message #33069]

Fri, 06 December 2002 14:42

Sean Raffuse
Messages: 46
Registered: July 2001

Member

Hello,

I have a routine that is slooooow. I would like to try and speed it up, but
I don't know where to focus my efforts because I don't know what part of the
process is taking all the time. So, is there a way to see how long each
section takes? I tried using systime at the beginning of each section, but
it only has resolution in seconds! If it matters, I'm on a Windows system.

Thank you,

Sean

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		anything more accurate than systime() ? By: Sean Raffuse on Fri, 06 December 2002 14:42
		Re: anything more accurate than systime() ? By: David Fanning on Fri, 06 December 2002 15:08
		Re: anything more accurate than systime() ? By: R.G. Stockwell on Fri, 06 December 2002 14:51

Previous Topic:	Re: New user - can't get Meta-tab to work on OS X
Next Topic:	Re: Issues with IDL 5.6 OS X and OroborOSX-v0.8 beta 2

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Dec 01 01:52:50 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.51974 seconds