Re: Nice Postscript output from shade-surf? Xsize in polyshade? [message #3356] |
Sat, 21 January 1995 11:15 |
Chris Jacobsen
Messages: 10 Registered: December 1994
|
Junior Member |
|
|
>> I would like to get a good output in postscript out of the shade_surf-routine
>> of PV-Wave.
> I really wish that the user could specify the image dimension of the
> shaded surface directly for the Postscript driver. The current
> situation is not good.
I believe IDL 3.6.1 has a flag on the SHADE_SURF command
specifically for avoiding these problems with PostScript
printers. But you're using PV~WAVE...
|
|
|
Re: Nice Postscript output from shade-surf? Xsize in polyshade? [message #3371 is a reply to message #3356] |
Wed, 18 January 1995 12:39  |
geomagic
Messages: 22 Registered: November 1993
|
Junior Member |
|
|
In article <3fjih9$i00@bartok.theo-physik.uni-kiel.de> solter@theo-physik.uni-kiel.de (C H Solterbeck) writes:
> I would like to get a good output in postscript out of the shade_surf-routine
> of PV-Wave. But if the device has scalable pixels, the output image has
> dimensions less or equal to 512. This is not good enough.
> How can I get a better resolution?
<proposal snipped>
I use the Z buffer and set the Z buffer size to obtain 300dpi pixels
on our dye-sub printer.
1. Setup Z buffer with approriate x and y sizes
2. Plot to the Z buffer.
3. Read the contents of the Z buffer as a image.
4. Plot the image to the Postscript device with appropriate x and y
sizes.
I really wish that the user could specify the image dimension of the
shaded surface directly for the Postscript driver. The current
situation is not good.
Dan O'Connell
geomagic@seismo.do.usbr.gov
Seismotectonics Group, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
Denver Federal Center, P.O. Box 25007 D-8330, Denver, CO 80225
"We do custom earthquakes (for food)"
or
"Just more roadkill on the information superhighway"
/\
/ \
/ \ /\ /\
/\ / \ / \ / \ /\ /\/\ /\/\
___/ \ /\/\/\/ \ / \ /\ / \ / \/ \/ \ /\_______
\/ \ / \ / \/ \/ \/
\/ \/
|
|
|