comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Response to question about PV-WAVE and IDL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Response to question about PV-WAVE and IDL [message #34] Tue, 19 February 1991 08:26
mpfh is currently offline  mpfh
Messages: 2
Registered: February 1991
Junior Member
In article <1991Feb11.184038.20437@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>
hearn@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu (hearn) writes:

> Ok, which should I buy IDL or PV-wave?

What are your criteria for purchase? What are your needs?
Why not start with an evaluation on your own system? Is everyone
in your user community comfortable with learning a new programming
language or are there also some who are more comfortable with a
point and click style of user interface?

> They were both the same at one point.

Precision Visuals has licensed the IDL software and has embarked
upon a large development effort to enhance and evolve the product,
documentation, and support.

> But now they are competing companies with almost the same product.

We have used IDL as the basis for our initial PV-WAVE product, the
Command Language version. From this solid base have added several
enhancements to the code and documentation. These include:

- RPC support for cross-network data transfer
- Floating license technology allowing license sharing on a network
- User library functions for volumetric gridding, rendering and
slicing, building menus with help on VT displays, plus fixing
and documenting many earlier routines which we found useful.
- Conversion utilities so VMS version users don't need to rewrite
"old" V.1 applications to use the "new" same-as-UNIX-version
- Learning aids including documentation, examples, tutorials, and
sample applications which help users quickly get started and
accelerate prototypes and development
- A widgets toolkit to help build build applications with a GUI
- Additional drivers including CGM, QMS, Tek 4510, and DEC UIS
- A new Point & Click version of PV-WAVE, for users who want a
full time graphical user interface, which compliments the
command version.

> Which one is in wider use?

More than 1625 PV-WAVE licenses in twenty countries have been sold
since 1988. These licenses can be shared around a network, so the
number of actual users is much higher. PV-WAVE is supported by direct
personnel in North America and Europe, and through distributors
elsewhere around the world.

> Which company actually wrote the product?

PV-WAVE Command Language is based on IDL. Precision Visuals has
full source code and is fully capable of making any changes or
enhancements required by PV-WAVE users. While both products share
a common "kernel", they now proceed along different development paths
based on the priorities and resources of the two companies. One of
the results of Precision Visuals' effort is PV-WAVE Point & Click, a
development project which rivals the scope of the original IDL
development effort.

> Which has the easiest interface?

I think you will find the interface for PV-WAVE Command Language
(with or without the widgets toolkit) and IDL to be roughly the
same, assuming you consider a command-line interface to be "easy".
However, PV-WAVE Point & Click from Precision Visuals provides a
MAC-like front end for Unix workstation users. While this type
of interface is easiest to learn and use, we have included a macro
capability, the ability to read in PV-WAVE procedures, and other
functions to provide flexibility. The Point & Click version also
provides Hypertext on-line help, a data previewer to help read
in data, a data table viewing function, and other capabilities
which speed up the process of reading, analyzing, manipulating,
and displaying data. PV-WAVE users can choose the interface
they prefer, Command Language or Point & Click, and still have
the same benefits which make the products so useful.

> Which company will stay in business?

I expect that both companies will stay in business, but they
will be somewhat different in direction and scope. Good question
though, because it indicates that you understand that sometimes good
code at a cheap price may not be the best investment in the long run.
Code is only part of a "product".

PVI has been in the graphics software business since 1980 and has
recently reorganized to focus on the PV-WAVE family. We have over
120 employees. PV-WAVE sales have been doubling each year since we
launched the product in 1988. Our research suggests that taking
PV-WAVE and adding a Point & Click interface (SunView = NOW, Motif
and OpenLook = very near FUTURE) will boost sales considerably.
We'll be around.

I hope that this helps answer the questions posted earlier about
the differences between PV-WAVE and IDL. If you have *any* other
questions, please feel free to contact me directly at
boulder!pvi!mpfh or at 303/530-9000.


Peter Hallett
Senior Product Manager
Precision Visuals, Inc.
--
Peter Hallett
303-530-9000 x 344
Precision Visuals, Inc. {boulder, ncar}!pvi!mpfh
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDL Internals manual
Next Topic: Multiple plots per page

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:04:00 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00186 seconds