| Re: Old log_log plot question ... [message #34338] |
Wed, 05 March 2003 07:20 |
jeyadev
Messages: 78
Registered: February 1995
|
Member |
|
|
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303051232560.1189-100000@localhost.localdomain>,
Timm Weitkamp <timm.weitkamp@nowhere.edu> wrote:
> On 04.03.03 at 20:07 -0000, Surendar Jeyadev wrote:
>
>> I have a question about the axes on log_log plots in PV Wave.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> How does IDL work with this data for xrange = [500, 1500]?
>
> A quick check gives me the impression that IDL behaves in the same way
> that you describe for PV-Wave, unless you calculate the tick values
> yourself and pass them to PLOT with the XTICKS and XTICKV keywords.
Hmmmmm .... Thanks for looking. There was a joke about the ultimate
copycat in my native tongue .... :-)
--
Surendar Jeyadev jeyadev@wrc.xerox.bounceback.com
Remove 'bounceback' for email address
|
|
|
|
| Re: Old log_log plot question ... [message #34340 is a reply to message #34338] |
Wed, 05 March 2003 03:33  |
Timm Weitkamp
Messages: 66
Registered: August 2002
|
Member |
|
|
On 04.03.03 at 20:07 -0000, Surendar Jeyadev wrote:
> I have a question about the axes on log_log plots in PV Wave.
>
> [...]
>
> How does IDL work with this data for xrange = [500, 1500]?
A quick check gives me the impression that IDL behaves in the same way
that you describe for PV-Wave, unless you calculate the tick values
yourself and pass them to PLOT with the XTICKS and XTICKV keywords.
Cheers,
Timm
--
Timm Weitkamp <http://people.web.psi.ch/weitkamp>
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
