comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services [message #34369] Wed, 12 March 2003 13:30 Go to next message
Dick Jackson is currently offline  Dick Jackson
Messages: 347
Registered: August 1998
Senior Member
"Liam Gumley" <Liam.Gumley@ssec.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:b4nni1$i6h$1@news.doit.wisc.edu...
> "Dick Jackson" <dick@d-jackson.com> wrote in message
> news:11uba.198256$na.6887526@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
>> A client of mine had had trouble allocating as much pixmap memory as
his
>> video card should have allowed. I just got word that the problem was
>> solved as follows:
>>
>> =====
>> Apparently Terminal Services uses video memory in such a way that
limits
>> the amount of video memory that's available to IDL. As soon as I
>> uninstalled Terminal Services, then I could create 6 pixmaps in IDL
that
>> were 20MB each.
>> =====
>
> Dick,
>
> Can you give us any more details about the version of Windows, and the
> method used to disable terminal services? I've also had problems
creating
> large pixmaps...

Hi Liam,

Well, it turns out it was on Windows 2000 Advanced Server. Terminal
Services are only available on Server versions. I'm running Windows 2000
Pro, and to check, I open Add/Remove Programs, click Add/Remove Windows
Components: Terminal Services is not available anywhere, so I'm safe
from this one!

I have had large-pixmap allocation problems in the past as well, and
everything made more sense when I realized that (just like in the RAM
discussion "Memory Headaches" from August 2002) a pixmap needs a
*contiguous* chunk of video memory.

I would love to find a utility program to show how Windows memory
(including video memory) is being used... anyone? This dandy little Mac
program gives the idea, does such a thing exist for Windows?

Cheers,
--
-Dick

Dick Jackson / dick@d-jackson.com
D-Jackson Software Consulting / http://www.d-jackson.com
Calgary, Alberta, Canada / +1-403-242-7398 / Fax: 241-7392
Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services [message #34374 is a reply to message #34369] Wed, 12 March 2003 08:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Liam E. Gumley is currently offline  Liam E. Gumley
Messages: 378
Registered: January 2000
Senior Member
"Dick Jackson" <dick@d-jackson.com> wrote in message
news:11uba.198256$na.6887526@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> A client of mine had had trouble allocating as much pixmap memory as his
> video card should have allowed. I just got word that the problem was
> solved as follows:
>
> =====
> Apparently Terminal Services uses video memory in such a way that limits
> the amount of video memory that's available to IDL. As soon as I
> uninstalled Terminal Services, then I could create 6 pixmaps in IDL that
> were 20MB each.
> =====

Dick,

Can you give us any more details about the version of Windows, and the
method used to disable terminal services? I've also had problems creating
large pixmaps...

Cheers,
Liam.
Practical IDL Programming
http://www.gumley.com/
Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services [message #34462 is a reply to message #34369] Thu, 13 March 2003 07:35 Go to previous message
Dick Jackson is currently offline  Dick Jackson
Messages: 347
Registered: August 1998
Senior Member
"Dick Jackson" <dick@d-jackson.com> wrote in message
news:mGNba.454366$Yo4.19986052@news1.calgary.shaw.ca...
> I would love to find a utility program to show how Windows memory
> (including video memory) is being used... anyone? This dandy little
Mac
> program gives the idea, does such a thing exist for Windows?

Oops, I meant to refer to it more explicitly... :-)
http://www.wap.org/journal/memmapper/memmaper.html

--
-Dick

Dick Jackson / dick@d-jackson.com
D-Jackson Software Consulting / http://www.d-jackson.com
Calgary, Alberta, Canada / +1-403-242-7398 / Fax: 241-7392
Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services [message #34467 is a reply to message #34374] Wed, 12 March 2003 13:38 Go to previous message
Rick Towler is currently offline  Rick Towler
Messages: 821
Registered: August 1998
Senior Member
"Liam Gumley" wrote ...
> "Dick Jackson" wrote in message
>> A client of mine had had trouble allocating as much pixmap memory as his
>> video card should have allowed. I just got word that the problem was
>> solved as follows:
>>
>> =====
>> Apparently Terminal Services uses video memory in such a way that limits
>> the amount of video memory that's available to IDL. As soon as I
>> uninstalled Terminal Services, then I could create 6 pixmaps in IDL that
>> were 20MB each.
>> =====
>
> Dick,
>
> Can you give us any more details about the version of Windows, and the
> method used to disable terminal services? I've also had problems creating
> large pixmaps...

The terminal services server is not installed on Win2k Pro and XP. The
client can be but I don't think that would interfere with IDL. Terminal
services are installed by default (?) on Win2k Server and Advanced Server.
I don't know about NT4. They can be removed by using the install cd.

-Rick
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Pointer Help - Referencing/Dereferencing in Functions & Procedures
Next Topic: Converting call externals from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 02:53:01 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.31714 seconds