comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services [message #34374 is a reply to message #34369]

Wed, 12 March 2003 08:34

Liam E. Gumley
Messages: 378
Registered: January 2000

Senior Member

"Dick Jackson" <dick@d-jackson.com> wrote in message
news:11uba.198256$na.6887526@news2.calgary.shaw.ca...
> A client of mine had had trouble allocating as much pixmap memory as his
> video card should have allowed. I just got word that the problem was
> solved as follows:
>
> =====
> Apparently Terminal Services uses video memory in such a way that limits
> the amount of video memory that's available to IDL. As soon as I
> uninstalled Terminal Services, then I could create 6 pixmaps in IDL that
> were 20MB each.
> =====

Dick,

Can you give us any more details about the version of Windows, and the
method used to disable terminal services? I've also had problems creating
large pixmaps...

Cheers,
Liam.
Practical IDL Programming
http://www.gumley.com/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services By: Dick Jackson on Wed, 12 March 2003 13:30
		Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services By: Liam E. Gumley on Wed, 12 March 2003 08:34
		Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services By: Rick Towler on Wed, 12 March 2003 13:38
		Re: IDL video memory vs. MS Windows Terminal Services By: Dick Jackson on Thu, 13 March 2003 07:35

Previous Topic:	Pointer Help - Referencing/Dereferencing in Functions & Procedures
Next Topic:	Converting call externals from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 10:30:00 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.95902 seconds