comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » output

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: output [message #34505 is a reply to message #34430]

Tue, 18 March 2003 18:19

tomson
Messages: 39
Registered: March 2003

Member

SO the best way is to upgrade to word2002.

"David Fanning" <david@dfanning.com> д��Ϣ��
:MPG.18e12542f8cc53a2989b20@news.frii.com...
> Mark Hadfield (m.hadfield@niwa.co.nz) writes:
>
>> "David Fanning" <david@dfanning.com> wrote:
>>> ...Microsoft is even
>>> smart enough to make the PostScript preview from
>>> the pure PostScript file I send it.
>>
>> That's a new one on me!
>>
>>> IDL 5.6 and Microsoft Word 2002 on Windows 2000.
>>
>> It doesn't do that in Word 2000 or earlier. Do you think it's new to
Word
>> 2002 or do you have some add-on software installed?
>
> I have to admit, it was a new one on me, too.
> In fact, I had to load the file twice, being very
> careful the second time that I knew exactly what I
> was doing, to convince myself I was seeing what I
> thought I was seeing.
>
> It is the first time Microsoft Word has ever done
> something on its own that didn't completely piss
> me off. :-)
>
> As far as I know, I don't have any special software
> installed. I rarely use Word (I *greatly* prefer
> Adobe Framemaker for writing documents) and only have
> it around to open the odd attachment I get from the
> poor suckers who have to put up with it. But I was
> pretty impressed with this encapsulated PostScript
> filter. Very slick.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> --
> David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
> Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		output By: tomson on Mon, 17 March 2003 19:47
		Re: output By: MKatz843 on Thu, 20 March 2003 09:55
		Re: output By: jeyadev on Fri, 21 March 2003 12:47
		Re: output By: Pavel Romashkin on Thu, 20 March 2003 09:45
		Re: output By: jeyadev on Fri, 21 March 2003 12:37
		Re: output By: Mark Hadfield on Wed, 19 March 2003 17:27
		Re: output By: Chad Bender on Wed, 19 March 2003 16:13
		Re: output By: jeyadev on Fri, 21 March 2003 12:30
		Re: output By: jeyadev on Wed, 19 March 2003 15:38
		Re: output By: tomson on Wed, 19 March 2003 00:12
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 20:52
		Re: output By: Mark Hadfield on Tue, 18 March 2003 20:40
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:36
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:19
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:12
		Re: output By: Chad Bender on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:05
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:06
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 18:01
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 17:59
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 17:26
		Re: output By: tomson on Tue, 18 March 2003 17:24
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 17:09
		Re: output By: David Fanning on Tue, 18 March 2003 11:45

Previous Topic:	IDL 5.6 PostScript B&W output is gray
Next Topic:	"broken" scale in IDL plot

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 12:29:48 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.32511 seconds