Output to fig format [message #25056] |
Sun, 13 May 2001 20:15  |
Dan Blair
Messages: 5 Registered: May 2001
|
Junior Member |
|
|
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
I am thinking about writing an idl script to directly write things to xifg
format without involving a spawn command to pstoedit (this is under linux/unix).
Before I set off on this big waste of time I was wondering if anyone
else had already done it....
<p>please let me know. If I get no responce I will go ahead
and start
<p>Best
<br>Dan
<pre>--
============================================================ ============
Daniel Blair & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Clark University
Nonlinear Dynamics Lab &nb sp; &nb sp; &nb sp; &nb sp; &nb sp; &nb sp; 508-793-7707
950 Main Street & ;nbsp; & ;nbsp; & ;nbsp; & ;nbsp; & ;nbsp; blair@nls1.clarku.edu
Worcester, MA 01610-1477 <A HREF="http://nls1.clarku.edu/~blair">http://nls1.clarku.edu/~blair</A>
============================================================ ============ </pre>
</html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: output [message #34427 is a reply to message #25056] |
Mon, 17 March 2003 23:09   |
tomson
Messages: 39 Registered: March 2003
|
Member |
|
|
I mean PS cannot be inserted into word.
Adobe can output CGM(Ansi CGM 3.0). Idl can output CGM, but I donot know how
to choose font. Maybe truetype font cannot be used in CGM?(!p.font=1 &
DEVICE, SET_FONT='times',/tt_font ??ERROR)
"David Fanning" <david@dfanning.com> д����Ϣ����
:MPG.18e04974d40aadd9989b1e@news.frii.com...
> tomson (tom2959@21cn.com) writes:
>
>> Hi,PS output is very good. But this form cannot be used in Word.
>
> Humm. That would be news to me and probably a number
> of other authors who thought it worked pretty darn
> well. :-(
>
> Maybe you should have a look at some of these PostScript
> tips:
>
> http://www.dfanning.com/documents/tips.html#PostScript
>
>> When I use
>> adobe to open PS file and save it as CGM or EMF, sometimes the new file
>> looks not the same as PS file. What is the matter?
>
> At the risk of stating the obvious, it's not, well, PostScript. :-)
>
> By the way, are you talking about the same CGM format that
> was state-of-the-art in the 1970's?
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> --
> David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
> Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
|
|
|
Re: output [message #34429 is a reply to message #25056] |
Mon, 17 March 2003 20:07   |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724 Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
tomson (tom2959@21cn.com) writes:
> Hi,PS output is very good. But this form cannot be used in Word.
Humm. That would be news to me and probably a number
of other authors who thought it worked pretty darn
well. :-(
Maybe you should have a look at some of these PostScript
tips:
http://www.dfanning.com/documents/tips.html#PostScript
> When I use
> adobe to open PS file and save it as CGM or EMF, sometimes the new file
> looks not the same as PS file. What is the matter?
At the risk of stating the obvious, it's not, well, PostScript. :-)
By the way, are you talking about the same CGM format that
was state-of-the-art in the 1970's?
Cheers,
David
--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
|
|
|
Re: output [message #34515 is a reply to message #34421] |
Tue, 18 March 2003 16:57  |
tomson
Messages: 39 Registered: March 2003
|
Member |
|
|
I can insert EPS into word and it looks good on the screen. When I print
the file, it looks not so good as file by inserting WMF or CGM(vector form)
figure. So I always convert PS to WMF. But sometimes the converted figure
is not the same as original one. I am puzzled.
By the way, idl can produce CGM and WMF figure. But they cannot be
controlled easily, sometimes the figure cannot be used(all black....).
"Meta Sienkiewicz" <msienkiewicz@yahoo.com>
??????:c005feb7.0303180739.f7b8c54@posting.google.com...
> David Fanning <david@dfanning.com> wrote in message
news:<MPG.18e04974d40aadd9989b1e@news.frii.com>...
>> tomson (tom2959@21cn.com) writes:
>>
>>> Hi,PS output is very good. But this form cannot be used in Word.
>>
>> Humm. That would be news to me and probably a number
>> of other authors who thought it worked pretty darn
>> well. :-(
>>
>> Maybe you should have a look at some of these PostScript
>> tips:
>>
>> http://www.dfanning.com/documents/tips.html#PostScript
>>
>
> As it happens someone was asking me the other day about inserting IDL
> postscript into Word. I did some checking around and I think it is
> necessary to install graphics filters (not included in the default
> install) in order to import EPS in Word. I saw something about this
> on the Microsoft web site:
> <http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;235928>
>
> Tomson, you can check on your Word install disk if you have it
> available to see if you can install the filter. Then you can check up
> on David's excellent tips.
>
> Of course if you can't install the graphics filter for some reason I'd
> recommend following Reimar's suggestion and checking Google groups for
> the previous discussion. (That's exactly what I did when the question
> came up the other day.)
>
> Regards,
>
> Meta
|
|
|
Re: output [message #34517 is a reply to message #34424] |
Tue, 18 March 2003 11:24  |
Mark Hadfield
Messages: 783 Registered: May 1995
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"David Fanning" <david@dfanning.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18e0ca208d5304a4989b1f@news.frii.com...
> ...Microsoft is even
> smart enough to make the PostScript preview from
> the pure PostScript file I send it.
That's a new one on me!
> IDL 5.6 and Microsoft Word 2002 on Windows 2000.
It doesn't do that in Word 2000 or earlier. Do you think it's new to Word
2002 or do you have some add-on software installed?
--
Mark Hadfield "Ka puwaha te tai nei, Hoea tatou"
m.hadfield@niwa.co.nz
National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)
|
|
|