| Re: 64 bit DLMS [message #34525] |
Thu, 27 March 2003 11:52 |
Ed Wright
Messages: 39
Registered: February 1999
|
Member |
|
|
> Define "fail in an odd way". >:)
The opposite of failing in a non-odd way, i.e. reporting the problem and the
details on exactly how to fix it. B-)
The error:
% CSPICE_DPR: Error loading sharable executable.
Symbol: IDL_Load, File = /home/guested/tspice/lib/icy.so
ld.so.1: /opt/rsi/idl/bin/bin.solaris2.sparc64/idl: fatal:
relocation error: R_SPARC_WDISP30: file
/home/guested/tspice/lib/icy.so: symbol strlen: value
0x61d9fcd2 does not fit
As always,
Ed Wright
--
DISCLAIMER: JPL requires notice in all electronic communication that
any and all opinions presented herein are my own and do not, in any
way, represent the opinion or policy of JPL, CalTech, NASA, or the US
Government.
I do not accept responsibility for unexpected collisions between NASA
vehicles and Alien cruisers, any resulting interplanetary war, or a grumpy
Kilrathi.
|
|
|
|
| Re: 64 bit DLMS [message #34527 is a reply to message #34525] |
Thu, 27 March 2003 11:41  |
Randall Skelton
Messages: 169
Registered: October 2000
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I have some DLMs that seem to work fine on Sun/Digital 64 bit machines.
I did have to migrate a few inherited routines that relied on a series of
clever bit-wise operations using assumed 32-bit memory addressing and
hard-coded 32-bit hex. Otherwise, I had no troubles ;)
A search on google for 'migrating 32 64 bit' returns a few hits. I don't
think there was one particular reference that I found helpful.
Cheers,
Randall
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Ed Wright wrote:
> To: IDL DLM Yodas
> From: Ed Wright
>
> Concerning DLM use on Solaris 64 bit architecture...
>
> I built an extensive DLM which seems to fail in an odd way when used in a 64
> bit environment. Before I dig into this, does the community know of required
> modifications or common errors when porting a DLM to 64 bits?
>
> As always,
> Ed Wright
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
