comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: PV Wave vs IDL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: PV Wave vs IDL [message #34541] Wed, 26 March 2003 12:07 Go to next message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Walburger (acwalbur@newstand.syr.edu) writes:

> We use PV-wave (V6.1) for our data processing (mostly time-series data).
> I was wondering what the major differences are between PV-wave and IDL? It
> seems that most of the examples I've seen on this newsgroup can be
> reproduced with a little massaging in PV-Wave.

In a word, objects.

Dave Burridge and I are nearly ready to release our Catalyst
Object Library, which we think offers huge advantages with
respect to the ease and speed of building programs with
graphical user interfaces. You could massage PV-Wave for
a long, long time without coming up with something like this. :-)

Cheers,

David
--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
Re: PV Wave vs IDL [message #34588 is a reply to message #34541] Tue, 01 April 2003 04:51 Go to previous message
jm is currently offline  jm
Messages: 32
Registered: April 2003
Member
Maybe also speed. I switched from PV Wave to IDL a few years ago
after benchmarking a demo version of IDL: it was twice the speed of PV
Wave.
The jobs were both compute and I/O intensive, though i'd guess the
advantage was largely due to faster computations than I/O.

-John Mardaljevic
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: IDL 6.0
Next Topic: Two questions

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:43:13 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00758 seconds