comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » IDL random number generator

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL random number generator

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL random number generator [message #35143 is a reply to message #35041]

Tue, 20 May 2003 07:30

James Kuyper
Messages: 425
Registered: March 2000

Senior Member

Big Bird wrote:
>
> David Fanning <david@dfanning.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.192c7f24abbae652989b96@news.frii.com>...
>> Folks,
>>
>> You guys might want to check out this Quantum Random
>> Number Generator. This one takes a LONG time to repeat! :-)
>>
>> http://www.idquantique.com/qrng.html
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
>
> I would mistrust this for the following reasons.
>
> The website states:
>
>> Being deterministic devices, computers are not capable of producing random
>> number generators.
>
> That statement is false: any odd soundcard has a noise-generator
> (essentially a glorified resistor with a big amplifier attached to it)
> that is capable of producing perfectly fine thermal random noise. I've
> used that for creating random numbers since back in the days of the
> Atari-800 (OK, so I'm dating myself here).

It's an exagerration, rather than being false. Their real point was that
the standard random number generators are not truly random, and can't be
truly random as long as they are entirely based in software.

> Even if a piece of external hardware was desirable for this process it
> could be cobbled together for $5 from a couple resistors, an opAmp for
> amplification and an RC high-pass filter (to get rid of slow drifting
> in the opAmp). Potentially another opAmp driven open-loop as a
> Schmitt-trigger. Gives you clock-free(!) bit-noise.
>
> Anybody who tries to sell a quantum-ANYTHING to make noise(!!) is
> direputable from the word 'go' in my eyes.

Thermal noise is not as fundamentally random as the quantum fluctuations
that determine radioactive decay. Among other things, your circuit will
pick up and therefore be influenced by EM radiation, which is not
random, and since it's thermal noise you're looking at, it will be
influenced by the temperature. I'll admit, it's a subtle difference, but
if you were doing serious scientific work using those random numbers,
it's one you should worry about when designing the program.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDL random number generator By: krijger on Fri, 09 May 2003 04:47
		Re: IDL random number generator By: David Fanning on Wed, 14 May 2003 16:28
		Re: IDL random number generator By: condor on Mon, 19 May 2003 16:51
		Re: IDL random number generator By: rmoss4 on Thu, 15 May 2003 08:19
		Re: IDL random number generator By: jeyadev on Tue, 13 May 2003 11:54
		Re: IDL random number generator By: tandp on Tue, 20 May 2003 19:54
		Re: IDL random number generator By: James Kuyper on Tue, 20 May 2003 07:30
		Re: IDL random number generator By: rmoss4 on Mon, 19 May 2003 21:18

Previous Topic:	Re: Postscript line thickness
Next Topic:	fontsize

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 03:41:33 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.50693 seconds