comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » spherical gridding
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Spherical gridding [message #35560 is a reply to message #35490] Fri, 20 June 2003 11:06 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
hunter is currently offline  hunter
Messages: 9
Registered: June 2003
Junior Member
Haje,

In the interest of completeness. I delved into griddata more thoroughly and,
of course, found that I had been a bit lax initially. Griddata works fine in
this application. Thanks for the pointer.

Interestingly, comparing the two resulting fields, one adhereing to
spherical coordinates and one approximating the sphere with cartesian
coordinates, the results are quite similar(using linear interpolation in
both cases). In fact, the difference in the resulting fields is, at most, 1%
of the minimm value of the original field. Typically, the difference is at
0.01%.

As for having "found a way around the physics", both methods generate
geometric approximations to a real field, not physical models. It just a
matter of establishing the error tolerances of the application.

Eli

"hunter" <elhunter@rci.rutgers.edu> wrote in message
news:3ef1d88d$1@rutgers.edu...
> I tried griddata using keywords for spherical gridding, but the results
were
> poor. However, assuming the lat lon coordinates were cartesian. gave a
much
> better representation of the data (visually).
>
> Eli
>
>
> "Haje Korth" <haje.korth@jhuapl.edu> wrote in message
> news:bcs8ba$24n$1@houston.jhuapl.edu...
>> I am using "griddata", which has been included with IDL since version
5.5.
>> It is much more powerful than sph_sct.
>>
>> Haje
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> "Elias J. Hunter" <hunter@imcs.rutgers.edu> wrote in message
>> news:3EF0A470.1080008@imcs.rutgers.edu...
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a matrix of surface pressure north of 60N, that is currently on
a
>>> gaussian lat-lon grid. My goal is to interpolate this grid to a one
>>> degree by one degree lat-lon grid. Now when I attempt this using
>>> sph_sct, the field south of 75 degrees lat looks good, the grid north
of
>>> 75 degrees lat is a mess.
>>>
>>> My guess is that the longitudinal resolution north of 75 degrees on
the
>>> new grid is so fine relative to the old grid, its creating a problem.
I
>>> suppose it could also be becasue I'm getting closer to the singularity
>>> at the pole.
>>>
>>> Has anybody addressed a similar difficulty using sph_scat?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Eli
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Source Code
Next Topic: Re: IDLWAVE and commenting out sections

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:54:42 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00473 seconds