comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Object Method validity
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Object Method validity [message #36190 is a reply to message #36180] Tue, 12 August 2003 15:10 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Pavel Romashkin is currently offline  Pavel Romashkin
Messages: 166
Registered: April 1999
Senior Member
If IDL didn't check for a .pro file for the method then feature you want
would only check for *compiled* methods. Does not seem reasonable
because having a method in a separate .pro file is not uncommon.
Besides,

> IDL will spend a significant amount of time
> searching the path for a file with the name

is an overstatement. I am not sure what file system one must have for
this to become a problem.
I would stick with error catching.
Pavel


Robert Moss wrote:
>
>> But be aware that if HopedForMethod is not bound to the class that
>> theObject belongs to, then IDL will spend a significant amount of time
>> searching the path for a file with the name
>>
>> obj_class(theObject)+'__hopedformethod.pro'
>
> That's what I was afraid of. Oh well, time for another minor feature
> request. Thanks for taking the time to answer.
>
> Robert
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Embedding colour IDL syntax in Word
Next Topic: Welcome to ITOOLS....

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 16:03:21 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00363 seconds