| Re: Case for XML (Was: convert very large string to numeric) [message #36314 is a reply to message #36245] |
Thu, 28 August 2003 15:07  |
mvukovic
Messages: 63
Registered: July 1998
|
Member |
|
|
Reimar Bauer <R.Bauer@fz-juelich.de> wrote in message news:<bik928$1jlf$1@zam602.zam.kfa-juelich.de>...
much intervening stuff deleted ...
>
> Dear Mirko,
>
> if you don't already have a datastructure for your common data or you would
> like to have an extendability one too which is also well defined then you
> should have a look at the icg-data-structure.
>
> A small example or a larger one whatever you want you can get by this call.
>
> write_icgspro,'my_trial.pro',/small,short=['time','O3']
>
> small is to set only a small amount of attributes. There are some more
> keywords available. For datasets without time or multidimensional sets use
> the /status flag too.
> In the new created routine is a lot of comment included to give some
> examples.
>
> http://www.fz-juelich.de/icg/icg-i/idl_icglib/idl_source/idl _html/dbase/write_icgspro_dbase.pro.html
>
>
> Reimar
Reimar,
I am either being very slow, or it may be my headache, but I only
barely understand the usage of your code (I found it and several other
related codes on your web site).
So, for the next few days I am going to give up on it. But thanks for
the suggestion. And please don't waste your time trying go give me an
example. I just don't have the time now to study your format in great
detail. (Desparately not trying to be rude here).
Actually, I see at least one thing going for your routines: They are
``open.'' In case of trouble, one can go in, and modify away. That
is not the case with RSI's IDLffXMLSAX object. Thus in case of an RSI
bug, there is no quick fix.
Mirko
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
