comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 [message #36569]

Wed, 08 October 2003 02:16

marc schellens[1]
Messages: 183
Registered: January 2000

Senior Member

>> try:
>>
>> in 5.4:
>>
>> IDL> cc=complex(0,1)
>> IDL> if cc then print,'true' else print,'false'
>> false
>>
>>
>> in 6.0:
>>
>> IDL> cc=complex(0,1)
>> IDL> if cc then print,'true' else print,'false'
>> true
>>
>> potentially dangerous, isn't it?
>
>
> Well, I don't know about "dangerous", but
> it certainly is inconsistent with the
> on-line help definition of "true" for
> complex variables. What did the good folks
> at RSI say about this when you reported it? :-)

Didn't report it yet.
But I think the good folks at RSI reading the newsgroup anyway.

marc

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 08 October 2003 02:16
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 08 October 2003 02:04
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: David Fanning on Tue, 07 October 2003 10:50
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: GrahamWilsonCA on Tue, 07 October 2003 10:19
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 09 October 2003 15:12
		Re: inconsistence in 5.4 -> 6.0 By: David Fanning on Thu, 09 October 2003 05:18

Previous Topic:	Re: javascript variable in ionscript
Next Topic:	Re: UNIQ and structure arrays

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 10:43:46 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.44180 seconds