comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » ROUTINE_NAMES
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
ROUTINE_NAMES [message #3665] Tue, 07 March 1995 15:29 Go to next message
thompson is currently offline  thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991
Senior Member
We're using an undocumented routine called ROUTINE_NAMES to retrieve the names
of IDL routines. For example,

f_name = ROUTINE_NAMES(/s_functions)
p_name = ROUTINE_NAMES(/s_procedures)
internal = [f_name, p_name]

We use this to assist the user in determining whether or not a routine is
internal or not, and whether or not a proposed routine name will conflict with
anything already defined, either internal or in the path.

Does anybody else use this feature, or think that it is useful? If the
consensus is that this is a good thing, I would like to ask RSI to upgrade this
to be documented, so that we know it will not go away in a future release.

I've been told that this feature is also available in PV-Wave.

Bill Thompson
Re: ROUTINE_NAMES [message #3781 is a reply to message #3665] Fri, 10 March 1995 08:42 Go to previous message
thompson is currently offline  thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991
Senior Member
Earlier, I wrote:

> We're using an undocumented routine called ROUTINE_NAMES to retrieve the names
> of IDL routines. For example,

> f_name = ROUTINE_NAMES(/s_functions)
> p_name = ROUTINE_NAMES(/s_procedures)
> internal = [f_name, p_name]

> We use this to assist the user in determining whether or not a routine is
> internal or not, and whether or not a proposed routine name will conflict with
> anything already defined, either internal or in the path.

> Does anybody else use this feature, or think that it is useful? If the
> consensus is that this is a good thing, I would like to ask RSI to upgrade this
> to be documented, so that we know it will not go away in a future release.

> I've been told that this feature is also available in PV-Wave.

I've gotten email from several people saying that they thought that this
feature was useful. I find it gratifying, but point out that RSI won't see
your opinion if you don't also post it or send them a copy.

Bill Thompson
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: reading double precision
Next Topic: Bug in PV Wave plot_oo?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 04:45:28 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.79638 seconds