comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » 2D FFT Slow. Any ideas?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
2D FFT Slow. Any ideas? [message #37257] Fri, 05 December 2003 00:57 Go to next message
Brian is currently offline  Brian
Messages: 27
Registered: March 2001
Junior Member
I did a little benchmark between IDL and MATLAB. In each case I created a
random double precision complex array of size 2048 by 2048 and timed how
long the 2D FFT took. In MATLAB 6.5 it took about 3.5 sec, and in IDL, it
took about 10 sec. Is there a way to have IDL use MATLAB for the FFT,
perhaps using activex? Or would the overhead in using activex defeat the
purpose?

thanks,

brian
Re: 2D FFT Slow. Any ideas? [message #37365 is a reply to message #37257] Mon, 08 December 2003 13:02 Go to previous message
R.G. Stockwell is currently offline  R.G. Stockwell
Messages: 363
Registered: July 1999
Senior Member
Hey, came across this message,
http://www.mathworks.com/company/newsletter/clevescorner/win ter01_cleve.shtml
seems matlab 6 incorporates fftw.
Perhaps that explains the difference in time between idl and matlab

Note: if anyone wants a windows binary of fftw (dll), it is available from
the
fftw website. http://www.fftw.org/


Cheers,
bob
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: how to pass a complex variable to fortran subroutine
Next Topic: reading 12-bit tiff image

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:28:25 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00436 seconds