comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL [message #37706 is a reply to message #37619]

Thu, 15 January 2004 09:06

Michael Wallace
Messages: 409
Registered: December 2003

Senior Member

>> Also, IDLDE's constant crashing doesn't help the
>> development process.
>
>
> True IDLDE for unix is unusable, IDLDE for windows has been nothing but rock
> solid for me on windows 98 thru windows 2000. The only time IDLDE has
> crashed in recent memory is when external code behaves badly. I would
> suspect that this would be the case for 99% of windows users.

I don't mean to take things off-subject here, but does RSI have any
plans to make a decent IDLDE for Linux/Unix? Or will they always leave
it in that half-backed, unusable and ugly state? Anyway, there are many
reasons while my primary development consists of gvim and command-line IDL.

Mike

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: Rick Towler on Wed, 14 January 2004 18:16
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: David Fanning on Wed, 14 January 2004 15:35
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: dcw_yip on Wed, 14 January 2004 14:49
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: Mark Hadfield on Wed, 14 January 2004 12:38
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: Matt Feinstein on Wed, 14 January 2004 11:32
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: Rick Towler on Wed, 14 January 2004 10:40
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: Michael Wallace on Tue, 13 January 2004 12:41
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: dcw_yip on Thu, 15 January 2004 18:07
		Re: IDL vs Direct3D, OpenGL By: Michael Wallace on Thu, 15 January 2004 09:06

Previous Topic:	polyfillv and the boundary pixels
Next Topic:	Unique combinations from a 1d array

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 10:01:57 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.67867 seconds