comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE

Home » Public Forums » archive » Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE [message #38698 is a reply to message #38531]

Mon, 22 March 2004 15:45

Mark Hadfield
Messages: 783
Registered: May 1995

Senior Member

RM wrote:
> So why is IDLDE so
> rubbish? Don't know!

Because it won't let you compile 3000 functions per second?

I think the OP's idea is very clever, but it's asking the system to do
something that was never anticipated by the designers. (Except, perhaps,
in a nightmare.)

I must admit I'm curious as to why IDLDE addds this overhead, and
whether it does it on all platforms. I'm sorry but I don't consider
"it's so rubbish" to be an explanation.

--
Mark Hadfield "Ka puwaha te tai nei, Hoea tatou"
m.hadfield@niwa.co.nz
National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: Sidney Cadot on Wed, 17 March 2004 01:47
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: Craig Markwardt on Fri, 19 March 2004 09:26
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: mwvogel on Fri, 19 March 2004 03:30
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: justspam03 on Fri, 19 March 2004 02:06
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: JD Smith on Thu, 18 March 2004 17:11
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: Sidney Cadot on Thu, 18 March 2004 14:48
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: btt on Thu, 18 March 2004 12:50
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: Sidney Cadot on Thu, 18 March 2004 12:40
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: Sidney Cadot on Thu, 18 March 2004 12:36
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: Sidney Cadot on Thu, 18 March 2004 12:32
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: justspam03 on Thu, 18 March 2004 01:13
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: andrew.cool on Wed, 17 March 2004 14:02
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: mvukovic on Wed, 17 March 2004 12:16
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: Mark Hadfield on Mon, 22 March 2004 15:45
		Re: Compiling file with many functions: huge performance difference between IDL and IDLDE By: richard.martin on Mon, 22 March 2004 05:49

Previous Topic:	image registration, robust
Next Topic:	compiling itools and utilities

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 02:49:35 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.55976 seconds