| Re: HASHTABLE class available [message #39154] |
Mon, 19 April 2004 17:13  |
Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Paul Van Delst <paul.vandelst@noaa.gov> writes:
> Craig Markwardt wrote:
>> Greetings--
>>
>> For those people who inquired about the HASHTABLE class that I
>> mentioned previously (which actually was zero people), I put it on my
>> web page if you are interested.
>
> Hello,
>
> I just had a lookee and noticed there are two methods _after_ the
> structure definition (KEYS and STRUCT). Is this right? How will they
> get compiled? I know little about how object definitions work so
> maybe it's normal? Has this got something to do with using
> forward_function or resolve_names or something like that? (I know
> even less about those than I do objects)
Good point. I'm enough of an object novice to have screwed this up.
I did too much testing with ".COMPILE" for me to notice the problem.
I have a fixed version available which simply reorders the methods.
Thanks!
Craig
--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@REMOVEcow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
