comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » problem defining vectors

Home » Public Forums » archive » problem defining vectors

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: problem defining vectors [message #39524 is a reply to message #39470]

Tue, 25 May 2004 15:43

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

elias writes:

> Thank you for all your advice, I have one more question:
>
> I want to combine xplot3D with flow3....IDL won't let me as I am doing
> it.... How can I fix that?
>
> xplot3D,flow3, /OVERPLOT

Oh, my goodness. You are trying to go from the
frying pan into the fire!

This particular transformation can't be done. They
are in two completely different graphics systems. They
do not overlap in any way, shape, or form.

If you like XPLOT3D and want to go in the direction
of object graphics, then you should consider the
SREAMLINE procedure. But I really don't think this
newsgroup has the bandwidth to help much in this
direction. :-(

I'd recommend getting ahold of Ronn Kling's book,
Power Graphics, if you want to learn more about
object graphics. I think you might find the normal
IDL documentation quite daunting.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		problem defining vectors By: heoa on Mon, 24 May 2004 14:09
		Re: problem defining vectors By: David Fanning on Tue, 25 May 2004 15:43
		Re: problem defining vectors By: heoa on Tue, 25 May 2004 15:30
		Re: problem defining vectors By: Chris Lee on Tue, 25 May 2004 00:09

Previous Topic:	Re: color for Flow3
Next Topic:	Using ASSOC

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 03:41:33 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.48112 seconds