comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Platform recommendation/tradeoffs?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Platform recommendation/tradeoffs? [message #4046 is a reply to message #3970] Sat, 15 April 1995 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
ps is currently offline  ps
Messages: 14
Registered: September 1994
Junior Member
Chris Jacobsen (jacobsen@xray1.physics.sunysb.edu) wrote:
: The CPU in a pentium is within hailing distance of the CPU of new
: unix workstations. If that's the only issue, a PC is a good platform
: for IDL in terms of bang for the buck.

: For me, a big issue is memory. For image processing,
: we will frequently end up with several 1024x1024 complex floating
: point arrays at 8 MB memory each. We can afford to have one $10,000
: unix workstation with 128 or even 256 MB of memory and a half-dozen
: X terminals so that one or two people can do image processing at any
: moment. We cannot afford to put 128 MB of memory in each of half a
: dozen PCs. Also, nobody ever screws up AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS
: on the unix workstation...

So get the PC, put 128MB and Linux to it. IDL 4.0 is announced for Linux
Then connect your XTerms to it and enjoy.

Peter

------------------ Peter 'PIT' Suetterlin -----------------
| Kiepenheuer Institut | Sternfreunde Breisgau e.V |
| fuer Sonnenphysik | |
| 0761/3198-210 | 0761/71571 |
-<ps@kis.uni-freiburg.de>-<suettpet@sun1.ruf.uni-freiburg.de>--
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Dragging mouse question
Next Topic: X device Resolution

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 02:37:35 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00188 seconds