comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Faster way ?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Faster way ? [message #41159]

Tue, 28 September 2004 09:05

btt
Messages: 345
Registered: December 2000

Senior Member

JD Smith wrote:
By the way,
> it's not fair to precomute min/max for HISTOGRAM outside of the time
> accounting.

oops!

Orginal Method (msec) 662.43482
Histogram Method (msec) 50.179005
Where Method (msec) 174.30687
Total Method (msec) 55.247068
Array Equal Method (msec) 49.051046

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Faster way ? By: btt on Tue, 28 September 2004 09:05
		Re: Faster way ? By: JD Smith on Tue, 28 September 2004 08:49
		Re: Faster way ? By: btt on Mon, 27 September 2004 14:12
		Re: Faster way ? By: Dick Jackson on Mon, 27 September 2004 13:46
		Re: Faster way ? By: Craig Markwardt on Mon, 27 September 2004 10:44

Previous Topic:	Re: Unique system identified?
Next Topic:	IDL filled contour to PostScript - wired horizontal and vertical lines ???

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 13:07:56 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.95904 seconds