comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » DataMiner?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
DataMiner? [message #31768] Wed, 14 August 2002 06:28 Go to next message
sso is currently offline  sso
Messages: 13
Registered: February 2002
Junior Member
Hi,

I'm wondering if anybody has experience with using DataMiner on 64
bits computers (Sun Solaris sparc stations)? According to the
specifications it's only for 32 bits machines, but some think that it
may work still on 64.

Next, a rather general question, but I just wonder what's the main
advantages of using (and buying) DataMiner compared to making SQL
calls (and C-routines) and idl programs separately and just link them
together by "spawn"? Computational speed?

Sverre Solberg
Re: Dataminer? [message #41228 is a reply to message #31768] Fri, 15 October 2004 06:09 Go to previous message
nando is currently offline  nando
Messages: 1
Registered: October 2004
Junior Member
Hi Michael.
I'm using DM by a number of months.
It is surely true your code can *appear* easier, but you have to consider
your performance constraints (if any).
For example, if you need to query a large number of scalar values, e.g. they
are stored in the DB as a field of a record, the DB returns an object
(IDLdbRecordset) and you have to loop on that via a number of methods as
hereafter:
myData = dblarr(N)
For i=0, n-1 do begin ;alternatevely a while statement checking for the err
on methode move execution, if you don't know the number of elements
err = obj->move(/next);go to the next record. obj is your
record-set after a query ()
record = obj->getRecord()
myData[i] = record.data
endfor

It is clear that if you have a large number of data, this approach is very
time expensive.
On the other side, I think it is a very good add-on for interactive aspects
when no large dataset must be treated. An estimation of 'large' does not
make sense (platform, code effectiveness etc.).
If you already have your database up, it is very simple to write a little
procedure to test the performance on you system.
Using a trial license of idl you can test this in 15mins.
Have a good work,
Nando.


"Michael Wallace" <mwallace.no.spam@no.spam.swri.edu.invalid> ha scritto nel
messaggio news:10mnvbh1v8g3404@corp.supernews.com...
> Has anyone used the Dataminer add-on to IDL? If so, what did you think
> of it? We're looking into buying it, but just wondering if it's really
> worth it. In our current setup, we interact with our databases in
> external code and when IDL is needed to plot or do something, we spawn
> it into action. Some tasks *appear* that they might be a little easier
> if all the code could be kept in IDL. Any experiences? Lessons
> learned? War stories?
>
> -Mike
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: errplot and plotting large data sets
Next Topic: Re: dot above a letter

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 14:26:11 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.56146 seconds