comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: PVI jerk toots own horn on net [flame; how'd you guess? : -]
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: PVI jerk toots own horn on net [flame; how'd you guess? : -] [message #410] Fri, 21 August 1992 20:00
gurman is currently offline  gurman
Messages: 82
Registered: August 1992
Member
[Lots of harsh words from earlier posts; deep questions about the
relative merits of two very nifty software products; then the killer:]

> --
> Adam Fedor. CU, Boulder | Fudd's Law of Opposition: Push
something
^^^^^^^^^^
> fedor@boulder.colorado.edu | hard enough and it will fall over.

Surely you realize that this is Fudd's FIRST Law of Opposition. The
Second Law, as I recall, is something about wasting Usenet bandwidth
with flame wars in one of the few remaining useful newsgroups for people
trying to work. 'Nuff said?

P.S. This is not directed at you personally, Adam, nor anyone else, just
PLEASE let's cool this thing off: I learn quite a bit by reading this
newsgroup --- or did before Wednesday....

Joe Gurman

--
J.B. Gurman / Solar Physics Branch / NASA Goddard Space Flight Center /
Greenbelt MD 20771 USA / gurman@umbra.gsfc.nasa.gov
| Federal employees are prohibited from holding opinions under the Hatch Act.|
| Therefore, any opinions expressed herein are somebody else's. |
Re: PVI jerk toots own horn on net [flame; how'd you guess? : -] [message #415 is a reply to message #410] Thu, 20 August 1992 09:11 Go to previous message
bradleyt is currently offline  bradleyt
Messages: 4
Registered: March 1992
Junior Member
In article <ALANS.92Aug19170731@abraham.juliet.ll.mit.edu> alans@ll.mit.edu (Alan Jay Stein) writes:

[Several personal attacks not worthy of comment deleted...]

> ***NOT!***
>
> First of all, this is no place to advertise! I can't believe PVI doesn't have a
> corporate policy prohibiting this, but I'm sure gonna find out now!
>
> And about giving you some credit:
>
> You charge way more for the same basic product, have no programmable X Widgets,
> and no IMSL link. And before you spout off about the NAG garbage, I'd like to
> remind you that this is a brain-dead, one for one parameter implementation, no
> easier than writing c-code which we can do without putting your kids through
> college. Apparantly, a few smart RSI engineers can do a lot more than a lot of
> stupid PV ones.
>
> And finally if you're working on a Unix box, can you really buy the "bigger
> is better" argument? IDL wins on price, and on features. In conclusion,
>
> *************> Stay Away from PVI, folks!!! Buy IDL!!! <****************

Geez, Al. Stop beating around the bush and tell us what you really
think! I mean, are you _for_ IDL or against it?

Todd.

--
| Todd Bradley -- Official Microsoft Spokesman
|
| WARNING/GUARANTEE: This message contains material which a truly
| free Society would neither fear nor suppress.
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: IDL widget question
Next Topic: I'm being paid to advertise for RSI ... NOT

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 11:31:10 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.87926 seconds