comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Would it be so bad for RSI and VNI to respo
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Would it be so bad for RSI and VNI to respo [message #4267] Thu, 18 May 1995 00:00
rfinch is currently offline  rfinch
Messages: 51
Registered: March 1991
Member
>>>> > On Wed, 17 May 1995 11:59:49 GMT, knipp@ipi.uni-hannover.de (K Knipp) said:

KK> I'm happy with VNI's and RSI's policy as it is now; I fear that
KK> as soon as they start responding directly to the group every
KK> 2nd posting will be by either RSI or VNI (and I really don't
KK> need that).

You don't need reliable answers to questions?
--
Ralph Finch 916-653-8268:voice 916-653-6077:fax
rfinch@dop.water.ca.gov / finger for PGP public key
"Nada burra la chamaca." A.G.
Any opinions expressed are my own; they do not represent my employer
Re: Would it be so bad for RSI and VNI to respo [message #4291 is a reply to message #4267] Wed, 17 May 1995 00:00 Go to previous message
patterso is currently offline  patterso
Messages: 36
Registered: February 1995
Member
K Knipp (knipp@ipi.uni-hannover.de) wrote:
: I'm happy with VNI's and RSI's policy as it is now; I fear that
: as soon as they start responding directly to the group every
: 2nd posting will be by either RSI or VNI (and I really don't
: need that).

If the posts contain useful information then I don't see the problem.
If they are just adverts, then I agree :)

Tim

: ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------

: Karlheinz Knipp
: knipp@ipi.uni-hannover.de

: ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------
Re: Would it be so bad for RSI and VNI to respo [message #4292 is a reply to message #4291] Wed, 17 May 1995 00:00 Go to previous message
knipp is currently offline  knipp
Messages: 68
Registered: January 1993
Member
I'm happy with VNI's and RSI's policy as it is now; I fear that
as soon as they start responding directly to the group every
2nd posting will be by either RSI or VNI (and I really don't
need that).



------------------------------------------------------------ ------------

Karlheinz Knipp
knipp@ipi.uni-hannover.de

------------------------------------------------------------ ------------
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: DICOM viewer in IDL
Next Topic: Re: Registration of 3D medical images

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:50:52 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00611 seconds