Re: Automatic Compilation [message #42952] |
Tue, 08 March 2005 09:17  |
Michael Wallace
Messages: 409 Registered: December 2003
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can confirm this and also add that you shouldn't use numbers in your
>> filenames, otherwise, they will not be compiled automatically.
>
>
> Huh? I use numbers all the time in my file names and they compile
> automatically.
>
IDL allows numbers to be used in routine names as long as the first
character is not a number. These get compiled automatically just like
ones without numbers. If you try to use a routine that starts with a
number, you'll get a syntax error.
-Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Automatic Compilation [message #43044 is a reply to message #42952] |
Tue, 08 March 2005 16:17  |
Kenneth P. Bowman
Messages: 585 Registered: May 2000
|
Senior Member |
|
|
In article <112rnhltohs0u8c@corp.supernews.com>,
Michael Wallace <mwallace.no.spam@no.spam.swri.edu.invalid> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I can confirm this and also add that you shouldn't use numbers in your
>>> filenames, otherwise, they will not be compiled automatically.
>>
>>
>> Huh? I use numbers all the time in my file names and they compile
>> automatically.
>>
>
> IDL allows numbers to be used in routine names as long as the first
> character is not a number. These get compiled automatically just like
> ones without numbers. If you try to use a routine that starts with a
> number, you'll get a syntax error.
>
> -Mike
Well, yeah, just like variable names, but that's not what he said.
Ken
|
|
|