comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » precedence question
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: precedence question [message #43128 is a reply to message #43003] Tue, 15 March 2005 06:35 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Foldy Lajos is currently offline  Foldy Lajos
Messages: 268
Registered: October 2001
Senior Member
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, David Fanning wrote:

> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?F=F6ldy_Lajos?= writes:
>
>> David's Operator Precedence Tutorial has the same table, and refers to
>> '[]' and '.' as equal precedence operators, so it is wrong, too :-)
>
> All I know is that as soon as you start parsing "left", "right",
> and "equal" people's eyes glaze over. It's right enough for me.
> If it's not right *always*, well, I don't hold people to higher
> standards than I aspire to. :-)
>
> Cheers,
> David
>

Sorry, David, I didn't want to attack you. Your tutorials (and the full
web site) is excellent.

I just came over an expression, where the IDL sw and docs contradict. I
wanted to know, whether this is a real contradiction, or there is a
"hidden rule" somewhere I don't know of.

OK, let's close this topic.

regards,
lajos
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Forcing READ_ASCII output to be a set of strings...
Next Topic: HIST_ND() used for resampling point data onto grid

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 14:46:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.87754 seconds