comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » precedence question

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: precedence question [message #43129 is a reply to message #43003]

Tue, 15 March 2005 06:13

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?F=F6ldy_Lajos?= writes:

> David's Operator Precedence Tutorial has the same table, and refers to
> '[]' and '.' as equal precedence operators, so it is wrong, too :-)

All I know is that as soon as you start parsing "left", "right",
and "equal" people's eyes glaze over. It's right enough for me.
If it's not right *always*, well, I don't hold people to higher
standards than I aspire to. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		precedence question By: Foldy Lajos on Mon, 14 March 2005 10:35
		Re: precedence question By: David Fanning on Tue, 15 March 2005 06:42
		Re: precedence question By: Foldy Lajos on Tue, 15 March 2005 06:35
		Re: precedence question By: David Fanning on Tue, 15 March 2005 06:13
		Re: precedence question By: Foldy Lajos on Tue, 15 March 2005 05:55
		Re: precedence question By: JD Smith on Fri, 18 March 2005 15:45
		Re: precedence question By: marc schellens[1] on Tue, 15 March 2005 04:43
		Re: precedence question By: Foldy Lajos on Tue, 15 March 2005 01:42
		Re: precedence question By: marc schellens[1] on Mon, 14 March 2005 23:53

Previous Topic:	Forcing READ_ASCII output to be a set of strings...
Next Topic:	HIST_ND() used for resampling point data onto grid

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Nov 28 11:45:31 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00234 seconds