comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: indexing 2-d vs. 3-d arrays...ARGH!

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: indexing 2-d vs. 3-d arrays...ARGH!

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: indexing 2-d vs. 3-d arrays...ARGH! [message #43615 is a reply to message #43614]

Wed, 20 April 2005 10:47

K. Bowman
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2000

Senior Member

In article <1114017881.895662.89690@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
"Henry" <henrygroe@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Let me echo JD's request: David, please, whatever you do, don't let
> your web page die. I use it too often, and (more importantly) refer
> people to it too often.

I'm sure David isn't *really* going away. He only *thinks* he wants
to go back to college. David is the Michael Jordan of IDL. (Remember
MJ and baseball?).

Ken

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: indexing 2-d vs. 3-d arrays...ARGH! By: David Fanning on Wed, 20 April 2005 14:08
		Re: indexing 2-d vs. 3-d arrays...ARGH! By: Henry on Wed, 20 April 2005 13:49
		Re: indexing 2-d vs. 3-d arrays...ARGH! By: David Fanning on Wed, 20 April 2005 11:15
		Re: indexing 2-d vs. 3-d arrays...ARGH! By: K. Bowman on Wed, 20 April 2005 10:47
		Re: indexing 2-d vs. 3-d arrays...ARGH! By: Henry on Wed, 20 April 2005 10:24
		Re: indexing 2-d vs. 3-d arrays...ARGH! By: JD Smith on Tue, 19 April 2005 16:27

Previous Topic:	deleting a window created with envi_info_wid
Next Topic:	why do not the results agree?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 14:51:48 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.48430 seconds