| Re: Program architecture question [message #43915] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 17:04 |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Marc Reinig writes:
> Hmmm, well actually I did mean structure, but now having looked objects up,
> they seem to be well suited, I assume you are suggesting that I use objects
> instead ;=)
That would be my suggestion, yes. Your project sounds
perfectly suited to them. :-)
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
|
|
|
|
| Re: Program architecture question [message #43916 is a reply to message #43915] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 16:54  |
Marc Reinig
Messages: 30
Registered: June 2004
|
Member |
|
|
Hmmm, well actually I did mean structure, but now having looked objects up,
they seem to be well suited, I assume you are suggesting that I use objects
instead ;=)
Marco
________________________
Marc Reinig
UCO/Lick Observatory
Laboratory for Adaptive Optics
"David Fanning" <davidf@dfanning.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ce19f85367c9d949899e7@news.frii.com...
> Marc Reinig writes:
>
>> Is that an unreasonable size for a structure?
>
> You mean "object", not "sturcture", right. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> P.S. No, it's fine.
>
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
|
|
|
|
| Re: Program architecture question [message #43918 is a reply to message #43916] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 16:50 |
Marc Reinig
Messages: 30
Registered: June 2004
|
Member |
|
|
Thanks, I always like to find the limits before I code, rather than after
;=)
Marco
________________________
Marc Reinig
UCO/Lick Observatory
Laboratory for Adaptive Optics
"R.G. Stockwell" <no@email.please> wrote in message
news:MxRde.46$PH5.4323@news.uswest.net...
>
> "Marc Reinig" <Marco@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
> news:4277e12d@darkstar...
> ...
>> The image array might be 1024x1024 x 16 bits. There would be other
>> arrays passed between the modules that would be 100x100 floating point
>> values. So my structure would be fairly large, >2MB.
>>
>> Is that an unreasonable size for a structure?
>>
>> Marco
>> ________________________
>> Marc Reinig
>> UCO/Lick Observatory
>> Laboratory for Adaptive Optics
>
>
> I think that is tiny :)
>
> Cheers,
> bob
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Program architecture question [message #43930 is a reply to message #43927] |
Tue, 03 May 2005 13:54 |
R.G. Stockwell
Messages: 363
Registered: July 1999
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Marc Reinig" <Marco@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
news:4277e12d@darkstar...
...
> The image array might be 1024x1024 x 16 bits. There would be other arrays
> passed between the modules that would be 100x100 floating point values.
> So my structure would be fairly large, >2MB.
>
> Is that an unreasonable size for a structure?
>
> Marco
> ________________________
> Marc Reinig
> UCO/Lick Observatory
> Laboratory for Adaptive Optics
I think that is tiny :)
Cheers,
bob
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
