Re: IDLWAVE 5.6 -- idlwave.org [message #43959] |
Tue, 10 May 2005 02:12  |
Thomas Pfaff
Messages: 15 Registered: April 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
JD Smith schrieb:
> IDLWAVE 5.6 -- http://idlwave.org
>
> This new IDLWAVE release features performance improvements and adds
> several exciting new features. A new right-clickable "active"
> breakpoint line is on by default, and allows you to perform common
> operations on breakpoints (like disabling, adding a condition, etc.)
> trivially with the mouse, and also pops up a tip describing the
> breakpoint when the mouse hovers over the line. See the new screenshot:
> http://idlwave.org/screenshots/.
>
> Breakpoint operation stability and performance has been significantly
> enhanced, especially when you have a large number of compiled routines
> (e.g. thousands). Large structures are now scanned much more quickly
> for class and structure-level in text help, and global structure
> re-indentation. Completion and help on inherited structures (in
> addition to inherited classes) is now supported, even if the structure
> is not documented in its own __define file, but instead in the current
> class file. With the optional complete-structtag module loaded,
> structure member can now be completed directly in the shell; IDL is
> queried in the background to determine the field names for you (similar
> to object methods). Thanks to Carsten Dominik for submitting this
> useful addition.
>
> A few new convenience bindings: C-c C-t prompts to visit a routine in
> this file (with completion), and \ipv and \pv are new abbreviations for
> "if ptr_valid()" then and "ptr_valid()". Examining complicated
> expression at higher levels on the calling stack is now more robust, and
> should not cause IDLWAVE to pause. Many smaller bug fixes and
> improvements can be found as well; see the CHANGES file.
>
> Get your fix at:
>
> http://idlwave.org
>
> JD
>
> P.S. Those of you who set your own shell prompt to something other than
> "IDL>" should be sure to use the format "^\r? ?IDL> " to avoid problems
> with IDL's intermittent use of return characters in the prompt, which
> would result in an apparently hung IDL session (anecdotal evidence
> indicates the frequency of this problem increased with IDLv6.1).
>
> P.P.S. The eagle-eyed among you may notice that IDLWAVE v5.5 went
> missing: this special version was made for inclusion with a new GNU
> Emacs release (at some point).
>
>
> ============================================================ ==============
> IDLWAVE Tip of the Month:
>
> Electric Debug mode is IDLWAVE's quick and powerful debugging mode, and
> it makes stepping through code, moving through the calling stack,
> examining variables and expressions, setting and modifying breakpoints,
> and much more a matter of a few key presses. If you aren't using it,
> and you debug IDL code and use breakpoints, you should give it a try.
>
> This is how it works. By default, when a breakpoint is hit, the buffer
> with that breakpoint is loaded, and the breakpoint line is highlighted
> in purple. The word "* Debugging *" should appear in the status bar at
> the bottom of your buffer, which indicates you are in "Electric Debug
> Mode". When this mode is enabled, the buffer is made read-only, and all
> sorts of great debugging commands are reduced to a single keystroke.
> Hit Control-? to list them. Space steps through code, descending into
> function calls, 'n' steps over function calls, 'h' runs the code up to
> the line the cursor is in, etc. A very powerful command is 'x', the
> all-purpose examine command. Use it on a variable or expression near
> the cursor, or mark a region and 'C-u x' to examine it. If you pause
> after hitting 'x', up will pop a list of examine commands available with
> one more keystroke. This list is even configurable... see the manual.
> E.g. x s invokes structure help, x d prints the dimensions, etc. If you
> like electric debug mode, consider turning it on for errors as well as
> breakpoints, with:
>
> (setq idlwave-shell-automatic-electric-debug t)
>
> ============================================================ ==============
>
Being a Windows user really sucks from time to time ....
Is there really no way to use this fine piece of art on non-linux boxes?
Thomas
|
|
|