comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Why IDL Is Not My Favorite Platform (was Re: IDL alternatives?)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Why IDL Is Not My Favorite Platform (was Re: IDL alternatives?) [message #4405] Thu, 01 June 1995 00:00 Go to previous message
zowie is currently offline  zowie
Messages: 9
Registered: March 1994
Junior Member
Joseph M Zawodny (zawodny@arbd0.larc.nasa.gov) wrote:
: In the future, please keep your "crufting" and "kvetching" to
: a minimum and get to the point (and along the way use real words).

I apologize if I've been too long-winded. The original nitpicky part
was a response to someone asking for specific examples of things
that are broken about the interface. I probably should have
taken it to email at that point, especially before using slangy
words and expressing strong opinions in a trade group.

:...[he's] saying "IDL does not look and feel like $1500 worth of
:software", but ... "despite that I prefer it for some strange
:reason and it does work".

Well, no, actually what I meant (and, upon re-reading, seem to have
said) was more like "IDL is based on a sound idea, but it isn't
implemented well enough to be worth $1500".
--
Craig DeForest
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Calling IDL subroutines from C or Fortran
Next Topic: Re: Contour filling in Polar Stereo

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 23:02:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.71978 seconds