| V4.0 Exclusive Button Groups [message #4364] |
Fri, 26 May 1995 00:00  |
cavanaug
Messages: 18
Registered: December 1994
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Here is one in what I assume will be many "How come IDL V4.0 handles
[insert programming concept here] differently than V3.6?" questions.
With V3.6, it was possible that an exclusive button group could have
none of the buttons set. With V4.0, this seems to be impossible, as
clicking on the button that was previously set does not generate an
event. I have lots of code where it is important that only one (or
none) of a list of conditions is set. I would like to retain the
"none" aspect of the conditions list, but it seems now I'll have to
revisit all this code.
Has anyone else experienced this behavior, and if so, is there a simple
solution to return behavior to that of V3.6 (without returning to V3.6)?
Thanks,
Charles
--
Charles Cavanaugh | "Words are very unnecessary, they can only do harm"
cavanaug@ncar.ucar.edu | - Depeche Mode
NCAR Boulder, CO, USA | "Facts all come with points of view"
My opinions | - Talking Heads
|
|
|
|
| Re: V4.0 Exclusive Button Groups [message #4442 is a reply to message #4364] |
Tue, 30 May 1995 00:00  |
thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991
|
Senior Member |
|
|
zawodny@arbd0.larc.nasa.gov (Joseph M Zawodny) writes:
> In article <3q4rb7$sgn@ncar.ucar.edu> cavanaug@uars1.acd.ucar.edu (Charles Cavanaugh) writes:
>>
>> Here is one in what I assume will be many "How come IDL V4.0 handles
>> [insert programming concept here] differently than V3.6?" questions.
>>
>> With V3.6, it was possible that an exclusive button group could have
>> none of the buttons set. With V4.0, this seems to be impossible, as
>> clicking on the button that was previously set does not generate an
>> event. I have lots of code where it is important that only one (or
>> none) of a list of conditions is set. I would like to retain the
>> "none" aspect of the conditions list, but it seems now I'll have to
>> revisit all this code.
>>
>> Has anyone else experienced this behavior, and if so, is there a simple
>> solution to return behavior to that of V3.6 (without returning to V3.6)?
> Hooray! I have been waiting for this feature to come about for some time.
> I think the solution to your problem is to add a button (call it NONE) to
> you exclusive button widget. You could test for the IDL version and add
> it only if your at or beyond (assuming RSI will not un-fix it in a future
> release) V4.0.
This new behavior may be good for you, but it obviously adversely affects other
people. The concept of backwards compatibility is an extremely important one
that RSI should pay more attention to. In this case, RSI should have allowed
for the additional functionality that you wanted with a keyword, rather than
changing the default behavior.
William Thompson
|
|
|
|
| Re: V4.0 Exclusive Button Groups [message #4443 is a reply to message #4364] |
Tue, 30 May 1995 00:00 |
zawodny
Messages: 121
Registered: August 1992
|
Senior Member |
|
|
In article <3q4rb7$sgn@ncar.ucar.edu> cavanaug@uars1.acd.ucar.edu (Charles Cavanaugh) writes:
>
> Here is one in what I assume will be many "How come IDL V4.0 handles
> [insert programming concept here] differently than V3.6?" questions.
>
> With V3.6, it was possible that an exclusive button group could have
> none of the buttons set. With V4.0, this seems to be impossible, as
> clicking on the button that was previously set does not generate an
> event. I have lots of code where it is important that only one (or
> none) of a list of conditions is set. I would like to retain the
> "none" aspect of the conditions list, but it seems now I'll have to
> revisit all this code.
>
> Has anyone else experienced this behavior, and if so, is there a simple
> solution to return behavior to that of V3.6 (without returning to V3.6)?
Hooray! I have been waiting for this feature to come about for some time.
I think the solution to your problem is to add a button (call it NONE) to
you exclusive button widget. You could test for the IDL version and add
it only if your at or beyond (assuming RSI will not un-fix it in a future
release) V4.0.
--
Joseph M. Zawodny (KO4LW) NASA Langley Research Center
Internet: j.m.zawodny@larc.nasa.gov MS-475, Hampton VA, 23681-0001
TCP/IP: ko4lw@ko4lw.ampr.org Packet: ko4lw@n4hog.va.usa.na
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
