comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: confusion around a pointer to an array of structures

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: confusion around a pointer to an array of structures

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: confusion around a pointer to an array of structures [message #45000 is a reply to message #44999]

Tue, 09 August 2005 11:53

Edd Edmondson
Messages: 50
Registered: January 2003

Member

Henry <henrygroe@yahoo.com> wrote:
> But, I can see no other way around this, aside from redesigning how I'm
> storing the information. Does anyone see how to do the equivalent of
> "((*a)[0]).x = 99d" in the above example? (without the awkward three
> line dumb hack I've shown)
> I'm sure I'm just not seeing something simple....

Is there anything incorrect about saying (*a)[0].x=99d ?

--
Edd

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: confusion around a pointer to an array of structures By: Henry on Tue, 09 August 2005 12:03
		Re: confusion around a pointer to an array of structures By: Henry on Tue, 09 August 2005 11:57
		Re: confusion around a pointer to an array of structures By: Edd Edmondson on Tue, 09 August 2005 11:53
		Re: confusion around a pointer to an array of structures By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Tue, 09 August 2005 13:07
		Re: confusion around a pointer to an array of structures By: JD Smith on Tue, 09 August 2005 12:21

Previous Topic:	On Unix IDL CD must mount with exec for install to work
Next Topic:	confusion around a pointer to an array of structures

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 13:17:54 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.07958 seconds