| Re: tickname problem? [message #4592] |
Sat, 03 June 1995 00:00 |
djl
Messages: 4
Registered: January 1994
|
Junior Member |
|
|
afl@cdc.noaa.gov (Andy Loughe) writes:
> There may be a bug in IDL 4.0 (What am I saying??!!)
> I try this to an X-device and everything looks fine...
> contour, dist(20), xtickname=['A','B','C','D','E','F','G']
> but when I try the same command to a postscript device I get NO
> xticknames whatsoever! What gives here? Enquiring minds want to know.
We found the same thing. RSI's suggested workaround was "Use global
variables" (!x.tickname, !x.ticks,...). Sure, that works, but it's not
really all that satisfactory.
We have experienced so many problems with IDL 4.0 that we have removed
it and are back to using 3.5.1 until something gets fixed :-(
Regards,
David.
--
| David J. Low dlow@physics.adelaide.edu.au Oooo. |
| ( ) |
| WWW: http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dlow/dlow.html ) / |
| "I'd rather be lost in the Darkness than blinded by the Light" (_/ |
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
