| tickname problem? [message #4601] |
Fri, 02 June 1995 00:00  |
afl
Messages: 51
Registered: December 1994
|
Member |
|
|
There may be a bug in IDL 4.0 (What am I saying??!!)
I try this to an X-device and everything looks fine...
contour, dist(20), xtickname=['A','B','C','D','E','F','G']
but when I try the same command to a postscript device I get NO
xticknames whatsoever! What gives here? Enquiring minds want to know.
One may have problems with ytickname, etc., but I have not really
tested this out yet. Can this problem be replicated at your site?
--
Andrew F. Loughe email: afl@cdc.noaa.gov
University of Colorado, CIRES voice: (303) 492-0707
Campus Box 449 fax: (303) 497-7013
Boulder, CO 80309-0449 USA
|
|
|
|
| Re: tickname [message #21837 is a reply to message #4601] |
Tue, 26 September 2000 00:00  |
davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Klaus Scipal (kscipal@ipf.tuwien.ac.at) writes:
> I wonder if there is a possibility of setting the graphics keyword tickname
> to an array greater than 30 using IDL 5.2.
No possibility. :-)
You can, however, always use the [XYZ}Tickformat keyword to
write a simple routine that can format the tick labels
anyway you like, which gives you the possibility of having
an unlimited number of string labels.
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
