comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Feature with PV-WAVE routine INVERT
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Feature with PV-WAVE routine INVERT [message #4629] Wed, 28 June 1995 00:00
black is currently offline  black
Messages: 39
Registered: August 1992
Member
This is afollowup to amessage that I posted a few days ago, but it's expired
here so I can't continue the thread.


I've detected a feature with the PV-WAVE routine invert, which inverts a matrix.

This routine has an optional parameter, status, which has the following states

0 = everything ok
1 = matrix was singular
2 = a small pivot element was used and it is likely that significant accuracy
was lost (the routine uses Gaussian elimination)

I looked at the value of status & for every example I tried status was set to 2
However on doing

PRINT, (INVERT(INVERT(matrix))-matrix)/matrix

ie finding the fractional error, this turns out to be on the 10e-6 to 10e-7
level. Status was always 2.

This seemed to indicate that the status level of 2 is somewhat useless

I e-mailed PV-WAVE support in the UK with this and this is the response that I
got.


I tried what he suggests. The PV-WAVE Advantage routine gives a 10e-6 to 10e-7
fractional error on single precision and 10e-14 to 10e-15 for double precision.

John Black


------- Forwarded Message

From: tom@vniuk.co.uk (Tom Gowers)
To: black
Subject: Re: problem with PV-WAVE routine INVERT
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 12:03:50 +0100


John,

Having tried out a couple of tests myself with INVERT, you are right that the
status always seems to get set to 2. The consensus was that where possible,
if you have access to PV-WAVE Advantage then use the routines from that in
preference to the Command Language routine if very high precision is of
paramount importance to you. (ie. in this case use INV rather than INVERT, or
as another example use FFTCOMP rather than FFT). However, upon comparison of
INV and INVERT on a 100x100 array, it seems that the accuracy is the same down
to at least 7 decimal places.

So in summary, I wouldn't worry too much about the status value, and if
precision of very high levels is of importance then try to use the equivalent
Advantage routine if one exists (and if you have PV-WAVE Advantage!).

Regards,

Tom
+----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------+
| Tom Gowers - UK Technical Support | Visual Numerics International Ltd |
|---------------------------------------| New Tithe Court |
| Telephone : +44 (0)1753 790600 | 23 Datchet Road |
| Fax : +44 (0)1753 790601 | Slough |
| | Berkshire |
| Email : tom.gowers@vniuk.co.uk | SL3 7LL |
+----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------+
| Check out the Visual Numerics Home Page : http://www.vni.com/ |
+----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------+
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: TRIGRID precision
Next Topic: Re: PV-WAVE/HDF/SDS

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 10:51:05 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.95958 seconds