| Re: recommendation of IDL for use in commercial app. [message #4688] |
Fri, 07 July 1995 00:00 |
patterso
Messages: 36
Registered: February 1995
|
Member |
|
|
David Wine (wine@actcom.co.il) wrote:
: We're looking at IDL for use as an adjunct to the software we provide with
: our spectral imaging camera. Does anyone else have experience using IDL
: as part of a commercial application?
As you can't run IDL as a stand-alone routine, that means that any
clients you have will have to buy IDL to run your software. That
could be expensive for them, I guess. Maybe you could put pressure
on RSI to release a compiler that produces stand-alone executables.
I think it would really help, as I often end up writing things in
languages other than IDL just because the end-user doesn't have
an IDL license.
Or maybe they could just produce a run-only IDL version?
: Our base application, for camera control, spectral image formation,
: visualization and analysis is written in C++ using MFC under Win32s.
: IDL 4. is supposed to be callable from a Win32 program. Has anyone tried
: it?
: Thanks for speaking up if you have any advice.
: --David Wine
: wine@actcom.co.il
: Software Development Manager
: Spectral Diagnostics, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
