comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Continuing Linux Education
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Continuing Linux Education [message #47353 is a reply to message #47306] Tue, 07 February 2006 08:33 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
JD Smith is currently offline  JD Smith
Messages: 850
Registered: December 1999
Senior Member
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:52:09 +1300, Mark Hadfield wrote:

> JD Smith wrote:
>> ... By the way, Emacs 22, when it ships, should have a nice modern
>> version of IDLWAVE, so the need to upgrade will be much reduced.
>
> Just curious, JD: Why do you use Emacs in preference to Xemacs?

For those of you wondering what the difference between Emacs and
XEmacs is, have a read:

http://www.jwz.org/doc/lemacs.html
http://www.xemacs.org/About/XEmacsVsGNUemacs.html

Mostly habit and inertia, but Emacs at (unreleased) version 22
actually surpasses XEmacs in many ways, at least for what I do. It
builds trivially for X11 on all Unixes and OSX, for Carbon under OSX,
Windows, etc. Some of my most used modes, like AUCTeX, target GNU
Emacs by default. The primary reasons for using XEmacs in the late
90's: image support, variable pitch font support, toolbars, scroll
wheel, etc. have vanished, as all of these things have been added to
Emacs with time.

XEmacs and Emacs continue to diverge, if slowly, and that makes
complex modes like IDLWAVE more difficult to maintain for both
platforms. IDLWAVE is developed primarily for Emacs, and then
"ported" (a heavy term for a simple operation on a few little bits of
code) to XEmacs. Also, since IDLWAVE is part of Emacs, and the Emacs
team has a somewhat more "structured" development model than the
XEmacs group, it's easier to target Emacs by default, and worry about
XEmacs compatibility later.

So, feel free to use either, but my personal observation is that
IDLWAVE under Emacs 22 offers the most stable and usable environment
for IDL development, with Emacs 21.X and XEmacs tied for second place.
Of course Emacs 22 hasn't been released yet (nor the IDLWAVE version
which supports it well), so your mileage may vary (and truthfully I
haven't even tried any bleeding-edge XEmacs versions).

JD
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: maximize widget bases in windows
Next Topic: Re: .full_reset_session causing a seg fault

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 18 04:47:31 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.67980 seconds