Re: IDL VM problems [message #47429] |
Wed, 08 February 2006 09:01 |
Antonio Santiago
Messages: 201 Registered: February 2004
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thanks to both,
but use of CLASS keyword is complex to me because I have to many classes
to be included.
Finally, as a fearless :) I have make a little IDL program that
generates a *.g file from a set of directories and a pattern to match
files. The *.g file compiles all the routines and classes, then
RESOLVE_ALL and finally SAVE. All seems ok.
Bye.
http://www.grahi.upc.edu/santiago/imdocs/idl/varios/gbuild.p ro.html
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Antonio Santiago P�rez
( email: santiago<<at>>grahi.upc.edu )
( www: http://www.grahi.upc.edu/santiago )
( www: http://asantiago.blogsite.org )
-----------------------------------------------------
GRAHI - Grup de Recerca Aplicada en Hidrometeorologia
Universitat Polit�cnica de Catalunya
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Re: IDL VM problems [message #47431 is a reply to message #47429] |
Wed, 08 February 2006 07:32  |
Benjamin Hornberger
Messages: 258 Registered: March 2004
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Antonio Santiago wrote:
>
> How to resolve automatically class dependences (like resolve_all for
> routines)??
>
>
I think what you need is the CLASS keyword to resolve_all. You'll need
to specify all required classes manually, I think there's no such thing
as automatic resolution of class dependencies.
Benjamin
|
|
|