comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Fractional Pixels Origin?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Fractional Pixels Origin?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? [message #47547]

Thu, 16 February 2006 21:15

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Greg Hennessy writes:

> Well, Wayne is right in that FITS convention says [1,1] is the center
> of the pixel.

I must be the only one *reading* Wayne's article. :-(

Let me quote it again:

"I'll say that the FITS convention is
that [0,0] locates the center of the pixel."

This whole thing just get curiousier and curiousier. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: David Fanning on Thu, 16 February 2006 21:15
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: Greg Hennessy on Thu, 16 February 2006 20:20
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: David Fanning on Thu, 16 February 2006 16:02
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: JD Smith on Thu, 16 February 2006 14:48
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: rm on Thu, 16 February 2006 06:24
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: Craig Markwardt on Wed, 15 February 2006 14:28
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: Wayne Landsman on Wed, 15 February 2006 13:31
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: David Fanning on Wed, 15 February 2006 13:03
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: JD Smith on Fri, 17 February 2006 13:25
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: mmiller3 on Fri, 17 February 2006 05:36
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: Greg Hennessy on Fri, 17 February 2006 05:06
		Re: Fractional Pixels Origin? By: Wayne Landsman on Thu, 16 February 2006 23:50

Previous Topic:	naming PS plots: variable+ string?
Next Topic:	IDLWAVE 6.0 -- idlwave.org

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:11:13 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00189 seconds