comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: IDL source editor :)

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL source editor :)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL source editor :) [message #47658 is a reply to message #47657]

Mon, 27 February 2006 09:03

Rick Towler
Messages: 821
Registered: August 1998

Senior Member

Antonio Santiago wrote:
> vcarlos wrote:
>
> Try jEdit (http://www.acoustics.washington.edu/~towler/jEdit-IDL.html).
>
Yes, listen to Antonio and try jEdit. It sits very nicely between the
rather anemic IDLDE (especially on *nix) and the can do just about
anything but has quite a steep learning curve IDLWAVE.

It is a mature editor with a large number of very useful plugins. It is
very easy to use but has depth if you care to explore.

I have recently updated the files linked above for the latest version of
IDL.

-Rick

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: IDL source editor :) By: David Fanning on Mon, 27 February 2006 12:20
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: Antonio Santiago on Mon, 27 February 2006 10:54
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: Rick Towler on Mon, 27 February 2006 09:56
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: Antonio Santiago on Mon, 27 February 2006 09:37
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: Rick Towler on Mon, 27 February 2006 09:03
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: Antonio Santiago on Mon, 27 February 2006 00:48
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: Peter Clinch on Mon, 27 February 2006 00:35
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: David Fanning on Fri, 24 February 2006 13:40
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: K. Bowman on Fri, 24 February 2006 13:08
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: David Fanning on Fri, 24 February 2006 12:52
		Re: IDL source editor :) By: Antonio Santiago on Mon, 27 February 2006 23:31

Previous Topic:	Reading both strings and floats from an ASCII file
Next Topic:	Re: Reading both strings and floats from an ASCII file

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 15:12:41 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.36547 seconds