comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: this might be a stupid question
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: this might be a stupid question [message #48197 is a reply to message #48196] Thu, 06 April 2006 15:18 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
David Fanning writes:

> Just for kicks, I'd change the ORB radius in Scatter_Surface
> and hope you see something with your data. The BIG problem with
> object graphics is that *everything* is possible, including all
> those things that are dumb, stupid, or just plain useless.
> Change it by at least an order of magnitude or so. If you change
> it enough, we might begin to get a clue to what is going on.

Here is an example of what I mean:

PRO main
x = Scale_Vector(Randomu(seed, 50), 35, 70)
y = Scale_Vector(Randomu(seed, 50), -50, 50)
z = Randomu(seed, 50)* 100
scatter_surface, x, y, z
END

If I run this with the default ORB radius of 0.015, the orbs
are too small to be seen. If I change the ORB radius to 0.5,
then I see the data, but the orbs looks like tiny sausages
instead of orbs. Sigh... Go figure. Better ask one of the
iTool experts. They probably have an idea.

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Curvefit issues
Next Topic: this might be a stupid question

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 14:07:31 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.55909 seconds