comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: auto-compile

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: auto-compile [message #49402]

Mon, 24 July 2006 09:55

JD Smith
Messages: 850
Registered: December 1999

Senior Member

On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:52:50 -0700, Robbie wrote:

> Ideally, we should be able to specify a compiler directive at the top
> of a .pro file to indicate that RESOLVE_ROUTINE should compile the
> specified dependancy.
>
> In practice, I tend to arrange my code into modules which live in
> separate directories. I tend to compile directories rather than
> individual files. For example, you might have a few different
> algorithms which are invoked by CALL_FUNCTION. I'd recommend keeping
> those in a module (subdirectory).

Those get taken care of in my library, it's when they occur elsewhere,
including the IDL !DIR/lib library, that it's a problem.

> My trick for IDL library routines is to use UNIX soft links. I just
> create a directory which contains soft links to the IDL library
> routines of interest. I used to have a IDLgrObjects module directory
> for all graphics atoms, but I think that iTools resolve all takes care
> of that now.

And how do you discover which of these are being called indirectly via a
CALL_*? Right now I use the "wait for it to break" method, which isn't
ideal.

JD

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: auto-compile By: JD Smith on Mon, 24 July 2006 09:55
		Re: auto-compile By: Robbie on Fri, 21 July 2006 15:52
		Re: auto-compile By: greg michael on Tue, 01 August 2006 02:52

Previous Topic:	Re: Which event model?
Next Topic:	Re: update on the promised new development environment?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 16:14:49 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.56702 seconds