Re: Movie replacement [message #49801] |
Fri, 18 August 2006 08:59 |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724 Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Jo Klein writes:
> No - I just thought, why reinvent the wheel - and besides, maybe
> someone's come up with a really nifty piece of code with all sorts of
> bells and whistles :)
Oh, I thought you were looking for something simple. :-)
Nothing simpler, really, than wrapping those three
XInterAnimate calls up in a procedure that takes
a volume as an argument. Then you have all the bells
and whistles of XINTERANIMATE available to you. As I say,
it would probably take two minutes, tops.
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. (Opata Indian saying, meaning "Perhaps thou
speakest truth.")
|
|
|
Re: Movie replacement [message #49802 is a reply to message #49801] |
Fri, 18 August 2006 08:48  |
Jo Klein
Messages: 54 Registered: January 2006
|
Member |
|
|
> Humm. And you are opposed to, say, two minutes of programming!?
No - I just thought, why reinvent the wheel - and besides, maybe
someone's come up with a really nifty piece of code with all sorts of
bells and whistles :)
|
|
|
Re: Movie replacement [message #49808 is a reply to message #49802] |
Fri, 18 August 2006 06:59  |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724 Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Jo Klein writes:
> Does anyone know a good replacement for the old MOVIE procedure? I find
> XINTERANIMATE quite tedious to use at the command line, it just takes
> too many lines of code to loop through a volume, and it seems a bit of
> overkill if you just want a quick look at a volume of data.
Humm. And you are opposed to, say, two minutes of programming!?
I guess you could always try XMOVIE if you are wedded to
someone else's solution:
http://www.dfanning.com/programs/xmovie.pro
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
|
|
|