comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: .compile_opt strictarr is persistent?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: .compile_opt strictarr is persistent? [message #50581 is a reply to message #50569] Mon, 09 October 2006 12:46 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Michael Galloy is currently offline  Michael Galloy
Messages: 1114
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
Kenneth Bowman wrote:
> In article <1160418720.740991.36680@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> "mgalloy@gmail.com" <mgalloy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Follow David's advice as above. I did try this because it seemed odd
>> behavior you were describing. IDL does not complain if you have a
>> compile_opt statement outside of any routine in a file. It will change
>> the behavior of the main-level (but not the routines in the file). I
>> think I will make a list sometime of the most dangerous things IDL will
>> let you do.
>>
>> Mike
>> --
>> www.michaelgalloy.com
>
> I have
>
> COMPILE_OPT IDL2
>
> in my startup.pro.
>
> I thought this was a feature. :-)
>
> (At least the short/long integer part of IDL2).
>
> Ken

I agree -- I have it in my startup file, too. But that's a batch file
that I know gets called on startup. Something like this just sitting
between routines in a file would be a tough thing to find.

Mike
--
www.michaelgalloy.com
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Low pass filter - Problem with kernel
Next Topic: string functions and arrays

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 22:35:46 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.71838 seconds