|
|
| Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file [message #50845 is a reply to message #50844] |
Sat, 21 October 2006 21:04   |
![Dominic[1] is currently offline](theme/default/images/xoffline.png.pagespeed.ic.XRkd1fkXye.png "Dominic[1] is currently offline")
Dominic[1]
Messages: 13
Registered: October 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hey,
I will gladly show it to you guys when it works... or, hopefully, it
will be running and you dont even know about it... hahahah.
Thanks for the nice words, but I think it is me who has to admire you
guys for your patience with me since I keep on asking all these
questions.
Talking of questions... :-) any idea about this post?
dometz
David Fanning wrote:
> Dominic writes:
>
>> By the way, I just found a book written by you in the lab... now, all
>> problems will be solved soon. :-)
>
> Somehow, I doubt it. But I have to admit: I *really*
> admire your perseverance with this. I would have
> given up a long time ago. If this thing ends up
> working, I *definitely* want to have a look at it. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> P.S. And, of course, I don't speak for the Chairman,
> but it this thing works, I don't see any way he can
> keep you out of the IEPA!
>
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|
|
| Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file [message #50846 is a reply to message #50845] |
Sat, 21 October 2006 20:38 |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dominic writes:
> By the way, I just found a book written by you in the lab... now, all
> problems will be solved soon. :-)
Somehow, I doubt it. But I have to admit: I *really*
admire your perseverance with this. I would have
given up a long time ago. If this thing ends up
working, I *definitely* want to have a look at it. :-)
Cheers,
David
P.S. And, of course, I don't speak for the Chairman,
but it this thing works, I don't see any way he can
keep you out of the IEPA!
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|
|
| Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file [message #50847 is a reply to message #50846] |
Sat, 21 October 2006 19:50 |
Dominic[1]
Messages: 13
Registered: October 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hey David,
By the way, I just found a book written by you in the lab... now, all
problems will be solved soon. :-)
dometz
David Fanning wrote:
> Dominic writes:
>
>> Is it possible to use RESOLVE_ROUTINE on a single procedure inside of a
>> file? So, I ONLY want to resolve procedure bar but NOT foo.
>>
>> file: foo.pro:
>>
>> pro bar
>> print, "bar"
>> end
>>
>> pro foo
>> print, "foo"
>> end
>
> I pondered this question as I cleared away the dishes
> from dinner tonight. And then suddenly it hit me! I've
> thought all along you were a Homeland Security agent,
> but now I see how wrong I was. You are a Zen priest,
> and these questions are koans for us! I apologize for
> not understanding sooner, Master.
>
> I see now that each question is a progression deeper
> and deeper into the unconscious self. They force us
> to wrestle with words that cannot be spoken, and with
> thoughts that transcend thinking. Leading us toward
> the Mystery of all life.
>
> In that sense, each posting here is a small poem,
> a sequence of questions similar to those asked by
> Pablo Neruda in The Book of Questions:
>
> XXXV
>
> Will our life not be a tunnel
> between two vague clarities?
>
> Or will it not be a clarity
> between two dark triangles?
>
> Or will life not be a fish
> prepared to be a bird?
>
> Will death consist of non-being
> or of dangerous substances?
>
> I thank you for your great kindness, Sir.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|
|
| Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file [message #50848 is a reply to message #50847] |
Sat, 21 October 2006 19:47 |
Dominic[1]
Messages: 13
Registered: October 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hey David,
I have never been called a Zen priest but I guess it is a step forward
from being called a Homeland Security agent... but here is what I am
actually doing:
My goal is to create automatic lineage tracing for IDL. So, when a
researcher runs an idl program to create some data products, the
execution will be automatically and transparently traced. When a
researcher needs to know how certain data products were created, he can
query the traces and see what was called to create these data products.
Now, for IDL we are trying to achieve this with wrapper functions
(automatically generated).
Sorry to disappoint you...
dometz
David Fanning wrote:
> Dominic writes:
>
>> Is it possible to use RESOLVE_ROUTINE on a single procedure inside of a
>> file? So, I ONLY want to resolve procedure bar but NOT foo.
>>
>> file: foo.pro:
>>
>> pro bar
>> print, "bar"
>> end
>>
>> pro foo
>> print, "foo"
>> end
>
> I pondered this question as I cleared away the dishes
> from dinner tonight. And then suddenly it hit me! I've
> thought all along you were a Homeland Security agent,
> but now I see how wrong I was. You are a Zen priest,
> and these questions are koans for us! I apologize for
> not understanding sooner, Master.
>
> I see now that each question is a progression deeper
> and deeper into the unconscious self. They force us
> to wrestle with words that cannot be spoken, and with
> thoughts that transcend thinking. Leading us toward
> the Mystery of all life.
>
> In that sense, each posting here is a small poem,
> a sequence of questions similar to those asked by
> Pablo Neruda in The Book of Questions:
>
> XXXV
>
> Will our life not be a tunnel
> between two vague clarities?
>
> Or will it not be a clarity
> between two dark triangles?
>
> Or will life not be a fish
> prepared to be a bird?
>
> Will death consist of non-being
> or of dangerous substances?
>
> I thank you for your great kindness, Sir.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|
|
| Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file [message #50849 is a reply to message #50848] |
Sat, 21 October 2006 17:56 |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dominic writes:
> Is it possible to use RESOLVE_ROUTINE on a single procedure inside of a
> file? So, I ONLY want to resolve procedure bar but NOT foo.
>
> file: foo.pro:
>
> pro bar
> print, "bar"
> end
>
> pro foo
> print, "foo"
> end
I pondered this question as I cleared away the dishes
from dinner tonight. And then suddenly it hit me! I've
thought all along you were a Homeland Security agent,
but now I see how wrong I was. You are a Zen priest,
and these questions are koans for us! I apologize for
not understanding sooner, Master.
I see now that each question is a progression deeper
and deeper into the unconscious self. They force us
to wrestle with words that cannot be spoken, and with
thoughts that transcend thinking. Leading us toward
the Mystery of all life.
In that sense, each posting here is a small poem,
a sequence of questions similar to those asked by
Pablo Neruda in The Book of Questions:
XXXV
Will our life not be a tunnel
between two vague clarities?
Or will it not be a clarity
between two dark triangles?
Or will life not be a fish
prepared to be a bird?
Will death consist of non-being
or of dangerous substances?
I thank you for your great kindness, Sir.
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|
|
| Re: resolving specific pro, functions inside of a file [message #50941 is a reply to message #50848] |
Sun, 22 October 2006 18:01 |
Andrew Cool
Messages: 219
Registered: January 1996
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dominic wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> I have never been called a Zen priest but I guess it is a step forward
> from being called a Homeland Security agent... but here is what I am
> actually doing:
> My goal is to create automatic lineage tracing for IDL. So, when a
> researcher runs an idl program to create some data products, the
> execution will be automatically and transparently traced. When a
> researcher needs to know how certain data products were created, he can
> query the traces and see what was called to create these data products.
> Now, for IDL we are trying to achieve this with wrapper functions
> (automatically generated).
>
> Sorry to disappoint you...
>
> dometz
Hi Dom,
Have you considered looking at Help,/TRACE, and maybe
Help,/TRACE,OUT='trace file.txt'
Help,/Source might Help you out too.
Even the old Help,Calls=a still seems to work in IDL v6.3
Cheers,
Andrew
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
