comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: hist

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: hist_nd question

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: hist_nd question [message #52930 is a reply to message #52929]

Mon, 05 March 2007 11:35

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

JD Smith writes:

> As is often
> pointed out, small loops which perform lots of work per iteration do
> not feel the loop penalty, and depending on the exact memory
> requirements, can actually excel over loop-free methods (yes, you hear
> me saying this).

Craig must be rolling over in his grave. Or is he
still out there? Haven't heard from him in a while,
it seems. :-)

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: hist_nd question By: Craig Markwardt on Wed, 07 March 2007 06:17
		Re: hist_nd question By: Wox on Tue, 06 March 2007 01:42
		Re: hist_nd question By: JD Smith on Mon, 05 March 2007 12:49
		Re: hist_nd question By: Kenneth Bowman on Mon, 05 March 2007 11:59
		Re: hist_nd question By: David Fanning on Mon, 05 March 2007 11:35
		Re: hist_nd question By: JD Smith on Mon, 05 March 2007 11:16
		Re: hist_nd question By: Wox on Mon, 05 March 2007 08:05
		Re: hist_nd question By: Wox on Mon, 05 March 2007 07:42

Previous Topic:	Checking for perl
Next Topic:	Re: Checking for perl

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Dec 01 17:03:28 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.28133 seconds